Home | Editor's Choice | Geoscientist Analyzes How Contaminants, Including Bacteria and Viruses, Move Through Groundwater

Geoscientist Analyzes How Contaminants, Including Bacteria and Viruses, Move Through Groundwater

It’s a topic that many of us don’t give much thought: How exactly do bacteria and viruses make their way through groundwater? Countless people can be sickened when this happens after flooding or heavy rains, for example, but what occurs on the microscopic level when this happens is largely a mystery.

William Johnson, a geoscientist from the University of Utah, recently analyzed the way in which contaminants move through groundwater, and he found an answer that may help water managers handle outbreaks spurred by floods and heavy rain in the future.

One big factor influencing how quickly or far a particular contaminant will move is how well it sticks to grains of sediment along the way. Some contaminants are just small molecules comprised of a few atoms; this is the case with arsenic and nitrate, for example. However, colloids, or suspended particles, are as much as millions of times bigger than molecules; this is the case for protozoa, bacteria, and viruses. Because of this size difference, they respond differently to their surroundings.

In fact, the forces that govern how contaminants and sediment surfaces interact is not unlike the electrostatic force you see at play when a balloon attracts hair to it or a Gecko attaches itself to a ceiling.

Big colloids have a limited random motion, so their chances of hitting the surfaces of sediment grain in groundwater are predictable. If the colloid and sediment contain opposing electrical charges, the colloids will stick to the sediment when they hit its surface, and their groundwater concentrations will be predictable in the sense that they will drop exponentially according to their distance from the source of contamination.

However, the conditions in the environment are generally not favorable to attachment. The surfaces of both the sediment grain and contaminant are typically negatively charged and therefore repel one another. So how do particles end up attaching?

Sediment can serve as a filter, as evidenced by experiments in Ecuador wherein excavating channels near rivers affected by mining were found to encourage water to flow through gravel banks, which then removed as much as 95 percent of the mercury in them.

“Decorative” theory helps scientists find answers

One interesting aspect at play is what the scientists have termed the “decorative” theory. The areas of varying properties found on the surfaces can be thought of as being akin to the decorations on Easter eggs or different patches of color on impressionist paintings.

Under this theory, colloids and surfaces interact in a limited interaction zone that gets bigger as the colloid size rise and expands as ionic strength goes down. The interaction net will therefore be attractive if attractive surface domains account for the majority of the interaction zone. Using this guiding principle, Johnson and his colleagues have explained how the colloid attachment occurs under different conditions in the environment according to colloid size, water velocity, and ionic strength.

Their simulations also found other phenomena at play. For example, they discovered that some colloids will attach quickly and others will attach slowly while seeking appropriate spots on sediments to successfully attach. In addition, they found a range of durations that colloids will stick to a sediment service, which they say can be used to predict transport across larger distances.

How does this tie back into what happens in groundwater disease outbreaks? Groundwater has a naturally higher ionic strength than fresh rain water because of the chemistry of underground water and rocks, but it can lose ionic strength during heavy rain. This causes the colloid-surface interaction zone to get larger, changing the overall interaction from being an attractive one to a repulsive one.

These findings have helped the researchers create predictive tools for enhancing contamination cleanup that could spare countless people from illness during outbreaks. Their research was published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.

Sources for this article include:

ScienceDaily.com

EurekAlert.org

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by Isabelle Z. of NaturalNews.com.

The NaturalNews Network is a non-profit collection of public education websites covering topics that empower individuals to make positive changes in their health, environmental sensitivity, consumer choices and informed skepticism. The NaturalNews Network operates without a profit incentive, and its key writer, Mike Adams, receives absolutely no payment for his time, articles or books. The NaturalNews Network is not for sale, and does not accept money to cover any story (or to spike it). NaturalNews Network is what the news industry used to be, before it sold out to big business.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


x

Check Also

REPORT: Manafort is talking to Mueller about reaching plea deal in second trial

President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort is discussing a possible plea deal with the special counsel’s office ahead of his second trial.

Are We Due for a Pandemic Flu? Here’s How to Prepare Just in Case

It has been 100 years since the Spanish Flu (also known as the 1918 flu pandemic) spread across the globe, infecting 500 million people and causing the deaths of 50 million – which was three to five percent of the world’s population at the time. Imagine the catastrophic numbers in today’s time if a similar […]